Humanism then, What Today?

We all know Humanism as an older term that has been around seemingly forever, but what is it? I asked that same question when I first started looking into this topic. In my research I’ve found a lot of interesting facts, ambivalent answers, and different organizations that strive to bring good to our world. Through it all I’ve found that Humanism is a controversial topic with new ideas popping up everywhere, but here I’ll just try to give you, the interested reader, a quick glimpse into this thing called Humanism.

A brief explanation of Humanism is that it is the study of the classic literature and philosophy that began in 14th century Europe. If you have any background knowledge about the Renaissance it might be helpful, but if not there’s no need to worry. In a nutshell, i learned that early Humanists studied what needed to be known for someone back then to be considered educated and civilized from John McKay’s book A History of Western Society (McKay). Now a day there are many different types of people who refer to themselves as ‘Humanists’, some of which I will talk about here.

On one branch there are Humanists who believe strongly in the teachings of the Bible. Notice now how I said ‘branch’ instead of end, because as you will see later on there is no black and white Humanism, but a rainbow variety with some colors that overlap. This type of Humanism is a more conservative type that believes in strong ties of religion to Humanism. One worldwide respected person who believes in this type of Humanism is the Pope who represents the church. In a recent speech given by the current Pope, Pope Benedict XVI, he emphasizes that people today are too concerned with material possessions and must change their lifestyles to follow the teachings of the Bible more strictly. He also states that the key to change lies within the younger generation and their education, saying that “the promotion of justice and peace requires respect for human dignity and human rights” (

On a different branch, one far away on the opposite side of the tree, there are Humanists that think in a more practical sense. Some of these Humanists associate themselves with a group called the American Humanists Association, or AHA. These pragmatic thinkers believe that Humanists are anyone who works to better human race. Some of these people believe that following the teachings of the Bible too strictly will hold back more creative thinking that they believe helped us evolve. This group, unlike others, has a set, written definition of Humanism they believe in (Lebrun).


This is one of many symbols used by the American Humanist Society (Loua).

Yet another branch on the Humanism tree that is who knows where compared to the other branches is a very science based Humanism. One advocator of this type of Humanism who is a well-known public speaker you may know is Sam Harris. In one of his speeches given in February of 2010 in Long Beach, California he talks about how the scientific method, which helped us make great strides in physical world, can also help us answer moral questions. His view of Humanism and goals of Humanists are constantly changing because he says they must accommodate the constant changing of our world. His view of Humanists is that we all have a duty to humanity to find answers to any and every question posed and record them in the “human library” for future generations to read and learn. Sam Harris’ brief definition of Humanism is to “Find something bigger than yourself, and dedicate your life to it.” While these questions are numerous, Sam Harris believes that humans have the ability to answer every question. While we may only scratch the surface to all the questions, he says the wonderful thing about being human is that we have the ability to try it (Harris). I found his speech to be very deep, opinionated, and interesting and I urge you to hear his whole speech on the Humanist Association of Ottawa’s page along with a speech given by A.C. Grayling on a similar subject here:

Coming back to the original question posted in this blog, ‘What is Humanism’, I can now safely say I have either answered all of your questions or confused you more. If your response was the latter or the two, then let me explain. There is no set definition for Humanism in my book, only a very vivid, common goal to better humanity. Humanists are people who strive for their own individual goals or goals of a group. The key is belief. As long as you believe in what you are doing and have a justified cause, then I’m telling you to go pursue your goals and make a change in the world. Go ahead and call yourself a Humanist if that’s what you want. It may have been called Humanism back then, but make of it what you want today.

Works Cited:

Harris, Sam, and A.C. Grayling. “Humanism Explained.” The Humanist Association of

            Ottawa. 2002. Web. 09 Feb. 2012. “Pope Emphasizes Human Dignity Portland.” |

            Portland News, Local News, Breaking News, Weather. 16 Dec. 2011. Web. 02

Feb. 2012.

Lebrun, Harvey. “Humanism With A Capital H.” American Humanist Association.

1994. Web. 02 Feb. 2012.

Loua. “Humanism.” Loua on HubPages. Feb. 2011. Web. 13 Feb. 2012.


McKay, John. A History of Western Society. 9. B. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2008. 407-




  1. erinwritesagain

    Nice post! If humanism is following goals based on strong personal beliefs, that makes everyone a humanist right?

  2. claire1431

    Great Post! I really liked your idea of “rainbow variety”, and the interesting point that you make that there is no black and white in Humanism. Is the picture you displayed something that a certain branch of humanists used to follow or abide by, or what is the significance of it? I really enjoyed reading this! I really like how you tied both the beginning and end together to remind the reader what the point of this blog is.
    Great Job!

  3. vijaye

    Hi Harry,

    I really like your blog post. I thought that you put a lot of useful information in it to give me (the reader) a clear understanding of what humanism entails. However, you portray humanism in an extremely positive light, when there are some who are strongly against it. What would you say to a person like David J. Stewart, who seems strongly against humanism (link to his website: I completely disagree with him, but I am curious to know what your opinion is.


  4. harry242424

    Hi everyone, sorry it took me so long to reply.

    Hey erinwritesagain, thanks for reading my blog! To answer your question then yes I would say if you strongly follow your beliefs that you think would have beneficiary outcomes then yes in my book you could call yourself a Humanist.

    Thanks Claire! I tried to use a creative metafore to help people better understand Humanism in this short article. I found the photo on a Humanist website that was created to show people a basic view of Humanism. I’m glad you enjoyed my blog and understood my metafore!

    Hi Vijay, I’m glad you were able to clearly understand my post and views! I took a quick look at the website you posted and I guess all I can say to David is that it’s honestly a matter of opinion. I don’t want to seem like a hypocrite and say he’s wrong, but I would say to him that he should just show his facts and then let people have their personal opinions about the topic like I did in my post.

    Thanks everyone!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: