The Biggest Waste of Time is … Education?

More specifically, a liberal arts education. Or is it? Well, if you ask Florida governor Rick Scott (link to full speech, here), it’s useless and will soon be subject to large budget cuts. And if you ask New York Times columnist, David Brooks (link to full article, here), it’s essential to modern society and should not be retired. Me, being a high school student and a few years away from entering college and choosing a major, decided to investigate.

Whatever the humanities enthusiasts may say, the facts are slightly skewed towards the math and science degrees. It’s no secret that science degrees are popular and safe. If you scan through the highest earning occupations for college graduates (full list, here), the top ten to twenty degrees are stacked with STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) related fields. Everything from zoology, to chemical engineering, to pre-medical degrees was included. If you scan to the bottom, there are an increased number of humanities related fields. These included education, music, foreign language, and English degrees.

But before English and history students are up in arms, there are a couple important distinctions to be made about science degrees. The first is the presence of science. Even me, a high school student, can understand that. Everything is related to science. From the building you’re sitting in, to the computer you’re using, to the pen you write it. Without science, it’s hard to imagine where the world would be and how we would be able to function. Science is used for two main purposes in my opinion: to improve our current lives by making them easier, or to solve pressing issues. Without STEM majors, scientific expansion and the evolution of technology would be seriously hindered.

The second is the world presence of science. With the world growing into a multi-cultural society, there is no longer a sole dominant country like the United States of the 1950’s. There is increased competition. An interesting fact to show this is of the comparison of the world’s education systems (full list, here). The poll is taken to show a country’s average proficiency with a subject and is taken out of one thousand points. The United States placed a paltry fourteenth in the latest education poll, not awful considering that the poll was taken out of the thirty four first world or close to first world countries, but dreadful considering other countries including South Korea, Finland, and Japan, placed higher, despite English not being the primary language used for communication purposes. However, the U.S. dipped out of the top twenty all together in math, placing a ghastly twenty fifth, despite the scores decreasing by only thirteen points (US reading was scored at 500, US math was scored at 487). This shows that more emphasis is placed in other countries on math and math-related degrees. With more emphasis comes more competition. And in order to match the competition, the United States needs to place more emphasis on these STEM type of degrees it would seem.

However, it is not so simple. English degrees are important. In a complete 180-degree spin, it seems as if English is related to everything as well. It is the way we communicate, the way we interact with one another, and it is the way our thoughts and ideas are expressed. Everything from this blog post to a street sign to a newspaper requires English or any other language. And where would science be if it weren’t for English? Behind every scientific project, is an excellent research paper, which communicates to the audience how and why the experiment was conducted, and the results of it. Likewise, I cannot imagine any current electronic devices doing well without excellent user interface or any companies doing well without excellent communication skills, which are both heavily influenced by the humanities degrees.

From the 15th and 16th centuries, large portions of education systems were based off of the study of classic texts, philosophy, and the liberal arts (McKay). The Dutch humanist, Erasmus, once proclaimed that a humanities education “implies the education and training most in keeping with our full human nature and most advantageous to our intellectual and moral growth” (Olin). Humanists, like Erasmus and who practiced humanism, which is the study of all components of human nature, especially individuals achievements, capabilities, beliefs and practices, and education and philosophy, believed that education, specifically the study of classics, both in literature and philosophy, was the basis of reform. According to John McKay, “these classics, humanists taught, would provide models of how to write clearly, argue effectively, and speak persuasively, important skills for future diplomats, lawyers, military leaders, businessmen, and politicians” (McKay 414).

David Brooks of the New York Times argues that the main reason why there has been a shift from humanities related degrees is because “when the job market worsens, many students figure they can’t indulge in an English or a history major”. He comments that there are many benefits. The first point he makes is that humanities fields improve the ability to read, write, and comprehend, which are valuable skills for office work. Also, humanities majors can write and express their thoughts easier and more articulately, which can lead to better big picture comparisons, can inspire ideas, and allow for deeper scientific inquiry. Brooks questions us by asking if “learning to feel different emotions, rehearsing different passions, experiencing different sacred rituals and learning to see in different ways” are important. He says that “these men and women developed languages that help us understand these yearnings and also educate and mold them” and that “they left rich veins of emotional knowledge that are the subjects of the humanities”. Brooks echoes the ideas presented by McKay by speaking about the importance of communication and studying history to further society and it’s benefits in current society.

I personally believe that both these types of degrees are essential. Because of this, I believe that they should be taught in an interdisciplinary fashion. While I have no experience in college, I believe that science should be taught in a more interactive fashion, with a larger emphasis on the reporting and communication aspect of the process. In a recent New York Times report, a high number of students show interest in science in their early years. However, approximately sixty percent of all STEM majors either switch degrees, or fail to receive degrees, which is more than double that of other majors. Even if a portion of those were to receive degrees, President Obama’s initiative to graduate ten thousand more engineers would be easily reached. The reason behind this staggering number is simple: science is hard. Even in high school, science is difficult. Majoring in a specific field at the nation’s most prestigious universities is an extremely daunting task. This is one of the reasons why science and math majors post the lowest GPA’s on most college campuses. One of the reasons I believe science should be more interactive is that learning advanced math and science in a class with over five hundred people can be very overwhelming. While science in school is largely experiment based, watching stuff blow up and explode, university science classes largely revolve around brute memorization, which most would argue, is extremely boring. No doubt, there are logistical problems with my scenario, including an adequate budget, but even the Association of American Universities, one of the most respected research institutions announced that they were planning on pursuing more interactive teaching methods (Drew) .

There are problems with English majors though. The first, like I previously stated, is that English fields are not always the most stable for high-income jobs. An interesting parallel could be made to the entertainment industry. For every famous actor or musician, how many on a day-to-day basis struggle by only receiving temporary low paying work? Similarly, for a writer, for every J.K. Rowling, how many writers are stuck with no source of income and unpublished pieces of writing? How many aspiring writers, like in the image below, are left to keep dreaming? While all engineers or doctors may not necessarily “break the bank”, there is no question that they can provide a steady income for years. What we (by we I mean people like me, the young people of America) choose to do with our lives will alter the course of American history. Will America in ten years be known as the country that produces the insightful and articulate workers in the world? Or will we be known as the country that consistently places in the bottom quartile in math education?

Did he make a mistake?

Picture Source:

Works Cited

Drew, Christopher. “Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (It’s Just So Darn Hard) .” The New York Times [New York City, NY] 4 Nov. 2011: Web. 1 Jan. <;.

McKay, John, Bennett Hill, et al. A History of Western Society. B. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2008. Print.

Olin, John. Christian humanism and the Reformation: selected writings of Erasmus. 3. New York City, NY: Fordham University Press, 1987. eBook.



  1. brianthemathematician

    The title of this blog post was really provocative; I thought it really helped in getting me to read it. I do have one question, though. Why do english fields not have the most stable high-income jobs? I am slightly confused on this point.

    • vijaye

      Hi Brian,

      Thank you for your response. I do not think that there is one universal reason as to why English fields do not have the most stable high-income jobs. I think part of it can be attributed to the higher need and use of STEM majors. Also, English fields can be somewhat risky to enter into. For example, one of the lower ranked fields is music. There are a lot of successful musicians, but there are also plenty who barely make enough money to make ends meet. Additionally, there are a high number of people majoring in English fields. In the New York Times article I referenced, a lot of science majors were found to have switched majors due to the STEM degrees being extremely difficult.

      Thanks again for your reply,


  2. josh1818

    Do you think that STEM related majors lead to higher paying jobs because they often have direct applications to real world situations, or because of how the level of science and technology is accelerating? Also, would you mind explaining what the photograph at the bottom shows? Good post packed with information.

    • vijaye

      Hi Joshua Thomas Yuan,

      I think that you are correct in that STEM related majors lead to higher paying jobs because they often have direct applications to real world situations. There are a high number of corporations now that require STEM majors by the masses, so the rise can attributed also to the acceleration of science and technology. The photograph I used was mainly to show an innocent college graduate, who may have done extremely well in school, but may not have a job.

      Thanks for your post,


  3. vinay1496

    Hello Mr. Edupuganti,
    Your blog post was quite fascinating and I appreciate the time and effort you have put in to your detailed analysis. My question is: What type of college education (in terms of both learning style and major choice) do you believe is the best for a person who wants to have both a high-pay as well as a strong fundamental understanding of communication and learning that is available with a liberal-arts education? Thanks,

    • vijaye

      Hello Mr. Iyengar,

      I believe that if STEM majors were taught slightly differently, incorporating more of the communication aspects of the liberal arts majors, then that would be one of the best degrees for a person to get. Of course, one can go into any field and get a high paying job, where they can utilize there communication skills. And not every single person should major in a STEM degree. But if there was a hybrid type of degree, that would be great.

      Thanks for your reply,


  4. becca0906

    Hi Vijay, I really liked your blog post. I thought it was very thought-provoking and really interesting to read. I was impressed that you not wrote about the information you found, but also made some suggestions about how to improve the education system. I was really interested to read that though the US puts so much of an emphasis on science and math, we have low math and science scores when ranked against other countries. Why do you think that Humanities majors have become viewed as less valuable than science and math degrees, and how do you think that the U.S. should encourage a variety of majors?
    Great job!

    • vijaye

      Hi Becca,

      Thank you for your response. I believe that humanities majors have become undervalued largely due to the higher emphasis placed on science by other countries. The US obviously does not want to fall behind other countries for one, but also with a high unemployment rate and companies, such as Google hiring a high number of oversees engineers, Americans want to see more STEM majors. I think that if more people stuck with their choice of science majors, then there would be a more equal balance. However, with a lot of kids transferring to other majors, the US is losing a lot of future engineers. Because the US is a democracy, it is extremely difficult to force kids to go into one major or another. I think the major encouragement to majoring in a science related field is the fact that there are more jobs available in those fields for a higher salary.

      Thank you again for your post,


  5. noah4024

    Evening Mr. Edupuganti,

    I have truly enjoyed reading this fascinating analysis of the current issues concerning the importance of a liberal arts education. I notice that a point was made that it is important to have a good balance and understanding of science, math, and liberal arts aspects of education. I was just wondering, if one of these categories were to disappear from society, which do you think would leave the least negative impact? Which one do you think would cause the most adverse effects if it were to phase out? Thanks.

    • vijaye

      Good Morning Mr. Noah4024,

      I personally believe that because they are both heavily interrelated with each other, it would be catastrophic if both were to disappear. So there is not a definite answer to your question. While it would seem as if science is the more important category because of it’s wide use, the study of English not only helps communicate the results of science, but also helps with communication and analyzing history.

      Thank you for your post.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: